Mr Manwairing has considered the salient point WHY ssm is an anomaly. In a nutshell, the understanding of the word (marriage) is the strength of the courts power to say nay or yeah.
Scalia recently offered a masterstroke of a question: ‘when did it become unconstitutional for two people of the same sex to marry?’ In reality, he is simply asking WHEN did the court define marriage?? Brilliant.
Once we travel down the road of ‘changing meanings of words,’ where will it end? What is the limit then on people’s rights? Can a little girl go to the local notary and ‘marry’ her turtle? Can little Spike ‘marry’ his iguana? Can Suzie then have 2 wives, 3, 4?? Can Louis ‘marry’ his horse? Sounds off the wall, but that’s the point, it IS off the wall.
Once a word has lost its meaning, he with the cleverest imagination win’s the day, and who are you to question his ‘rights?’ Mr Webster would roll over in his grave upon hearing of the bastardization of a good word. Marriage has long been understood in the context of how it was defined: male and female, and I would add ‘male and female created he them,’ referring to he who arranged the institution. This can easily be left out without diminishing the common sense portion of our show.
How will this turn out? I think we are in for a surprise.
Reblogged this on God's Enduring Love and commented:
We will know soon enough what the Feds will do to rewrite all the dictionaries over the definition of marriage. Read this poignant post!
Yes, people do not want to face the truth that God in heaven designed ‘marriage.’ It is He who man despises. People in China or South America do not argue as to what an elephant is, it is common knowledge. But nowadays, the societal misfits must change the ‘elephant!’
‘Evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse.’ Tkx for the reblog.
Heaven and Earth shall pass away, but the Word of the Lord shall abide forever. All things are by Him, For Him, and to HIm! To God be the glory! Amen.
(21) I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.
(22) Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
no one should be allowed to redefine marriage.we have some loons in my country too that are trying to get attention,but no one supports them except stupid liberal politicians.All i know is they are never ever getting support from me.
Yes, as observed, a kid could then ‘marry’ his goldfish. Some would say that is ludicrous, but not really. One could make the word mean whatever they wish. This is how far mankind has sunk in the mire of his own image. Tkx Ana.