So how many people have I offended because I have not included her maiden name? So what, who cares?
In the middle of her testimony today, here are a few observations:
-Not ONE Democrat has offered the idea that we will reserve opinion UNTIL we hear from the accused. Wow, what a novel idea.
-This professional psychologist with a dozen degrees is applauded for her bravery, yet she needs a therapist? Appears she has other issues and baggage no one has recognized.
-She loosely throws out her knowledge of the hippocampus, the lobe, and the brains ability to CONTROL information, but has trouble remembering basic facts?
-Supposedly, her life was traumatized so badly, yet she managed to conduct a ‘normal life,’ including a ‘normal’ rest of that day…………….and replete with a thousand exotic vacations that most would only dream of.
-Polygraph? Ha, any psychologist could manipulate information. Brain specialists doncha know.
-She didn’t know what ‘exculpatory ‘ meant? Really? I mean really?
-Her voice is notably weak, and her ‘woe is me’ tale is boring.
-Feinstein, Durbin, etc. are an embarrassment.
-Ms. Mitchell is treating Ford with kid gloves, but is constructing the demolition of her story, or so it seems.
-Grassley is more than fair.
-How can any sane person judge a matter before they hear from both parties? Kavanaugh will surprise with his turn.
-Remember,, these are ALLEGATIONS.
Now let’s wait for the accused to tell his tale.