Oh how they pontificate

The much revered hero of artificial intellect, aka, the godfather of atheism, Richard Hawkins, when speaking of Trump, opened his trap regarding the silencing of ‘words’ he finds offensive and said this:

‘He went far beyond expression of opinion (which should be protected) to outright lies, demonstrable falsehoods.’

Yeah ok, here we have a man that is clueless regarding ‘TRUTH’ yet pretends to be an arbiter of left and right, right and wrong? Yep, I’m convinced….

Hey Rich: who spreads the lie of the greatest LIE of the ages, ‘there is no God?’ It is you sir. Hey Rich, who spreads the lie that the universe is 13.6 billion years old? It is you sir, for you have not one drop of verifiable, observable, and testable proof. None. Your guesswork is embarrassing so stop it.

Back to point 1. Since there is no God, there is (according to your own words) no truth, and you have made yourself the very God you despise. It is you who sits upon the circle of the earth and decides what words can be heard, and what words should be censored.

You promote the words that you approve, and decide by fiat what words should be silenced. So forget about Trump. I’m talking about you Rich. Why should your lies be welcomed in the arena of ideas?

But more. Demonstrable falsehoods? Ha! You sir are the president of this drunken society. You are wearing a hat that is too big for your head and may be putting pressure on your brain. Perhaps you should spend time ALONE, apart from the influence of others like you who all drink at the poisoned well of rancid water which you gulp and yet swear it is refreshing.

Dare you stand on the oceans where not a human can be seen for thousands of miles and say ‘my evolution made this!’ Dare you accuse mighty Everest of random serendipity which appeared having no planning nor purpose? Now you then dare to promote your ‘falsehoods and demonstrable lies’ by saying that these waters and mountains are proof of your ‘13.6 yr. old theory?’ Right, I forgot, that gallon of water had children which had children which had children and ‘grew’ into the Pacific. Pathetic.

So demonstrable falsehoods eh? There is only one person wearing a dunce cap in this discussion. So let’s silence my words, but not yours. Let’s silence Michael Savage, but not Jack Dorsey. See the pattern of stupidity?

But to show and prove I am the well balanced person here, and you are out to lunch, I approve of your right to promote your ‘demonstrable lies,’ because I am secure in my ability to dismantle them in 3 seconds flat with two seconds left over. But it is only a world of mental insecurity which is threatened by MY views.

You sir, are weighed in the balance, and are found to be severely wanting. My leash of grace and patience is something you cannot fathom, and my seemingly stinging words are really words of restraint. You should hear what I’m thinking.

So the water, gold, and coal below, the wood, leather, flora, and fauna upon, the air, clouds, water, and sky, as well as the feathers above………..all point to your ‘truth’ of ‘testable evidence’ which supports your 13.6 yrs of godlessness………………(Ugh I can’t stand it)

Stop it Rich. Stop the lies. Leave some space in your heart for truth. Engage the brain first and enjoy free speech. But I’ll stand by and approve of watching a tongue operate without understanding.

About ColorStorm

Blending the colorful issues of life with the unapologetic truth of scripture, while adding some gracious ferocity.
This entry was posted in Daily news and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Oh how they pontificate

  1. sklyjd says:

    Evidence, facts and reality make a truth, the universe is 13.6 billion years old, your faith has none of these truths CS.

    Science has moved on and all religions have stood still. Trump the leader who was claimed by his disciples to be ordained by the Christian God has failed.

    time to move on, time to lick wounds and as you say retrieve mental security, time for many Americans to take those silly red hats off and find their Christian morals again, if indeed they had any from the start.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ColorStorm says:

      Tkx Steve but no. Not about Trump.

      ‘Demonstrable lies,’ as assumed by Hawkins. To your point, a man is just as correct when he says the universe is 19 billion years old, 4 trillion, or 14, 000. See how this works.

      To say ‘I know,’ as you do, is a laughable lie. That’s the greater point here. Hawkins points the finger at politicians, yet fails to see the dizzying contradictions of his own position. So no, there is no ‘moving on’ from pretended truths, truths which are hidden from imposters.

      I have PROVED on my occasions the untenable positions of Hawkins, Nye, Degrasse, etc, as being sleight of hand clown like comedians- who wouldn’t know Truth if it knocked on their door-

      These people pretend to be ‘forward’ in their thinking by eliminating gender distinctions- such as Pelosicrats wanting to erase ‘he, she, him, her,’ etc from the very halls of Congress, yet you wonder why people rebel? Really?

      And you are lecturing others in what is truth, when common sense is thought be be archaic???

      Please. Hawkins science is fraudulent- and if you pitch your tent in that camp, I can only hope for you.

      As to faith, don’t knock what you don’t understand, You have used faith a thousand times today without even thinking about it.

      Like

      • sklyjd says:

        Really CS? Would your God allow Hawkins and Dawkins, Nye, DeGrasse or any other scientist to learn so much, advertise their knowledge to the world and bring into question the existence of himself?

        No, I do not think so. God destroyed cities and the people for indulging in sin so what is worse than that for a jealous God? Yes obviously the rejection of his existence and the belief in something else. I do not see scientists being struck down by lightning, but in fact I see them as life savers of the human race. Yes I know they are also destroyers of the human race. They are not gods, but they are essential to humans and the planets continued existence and that is something even the most radical Christian would have to admit.

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Steve u went mod because of links I think.

          Your ‘scientists’ cannot get right today’s weather forecast for God’s sake using every drop of modern tech.

          Science is rife with pitfalls, opinion, contradictions, and borrows from equally terrible premises.

          The mere fact that such ignorant loudmouths as Tyson- are even alive after such overt disrespect for the Creator- is plenty of proof that the patience of God is as scripture presents-

          But while I’m here- I suggest you look into what ‘scientists’ ignore to their own demise- that is ‘the molten looking glass’ above. Science is therefore embarrassed while God’s word is true-

          Hint hint. Operation Fishbowl/ Highjump.

          Like

    • Citizen Tom says:

      @sklyjd

      The “experts” have extrapolated the age of the universe base upon the red shift, that is the observation that the stars all appear to be moving away from each other. As any mathematician can tell you extrapolating a curve based upon one far removed point is unlikely to produce an accurate result. Moreover, the Big Bang Theory is extremely speculative. There is absolutely no way to verify it.

      When astronomers study objects far away in space and time, they are guessing at what they are looking at. So, don’t take it too seriously.

      Liked by 1 person

      • sklyjd says:

        You have not kept completely up to date with science lately CT. This is high tech equipment without any guessing but does allow for reasonably accurate estimating from the information and evidence they have. You know this is how science does things, and you should take this seriously.

        A 2013 map of the background radiation left over from the Big Bang, taken by the ESA’s Planck spacecraft, captured the oldest light in the universe. This information helps astronomers determine the age of the universe. According to research, the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old. Jun 8, 2017

        https://www.space.com/24054-how-old-is-the-universe.html

        Astronomers estimate the age of the universe in two ways: 1) by looking for the oldest stars; and 2) by measuring the rate of expansion of the universe and extrapolating back to the Big Bang; just as crime detectives can trace the origin of a bullet from the holes in a wall. Dec 21, 2012

        https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_age.html

        Like

        • Citizen Tom says:

          @sklyjd

          Oldest light? 🤣

          I will agree that we are looking at the light from stars and galaxies at various distances, and the theory that the longer the longer that the light travels travels from the star the longer it took to arrive here, but it is all arriving here at the same time. That is the reference time for our calculation. Even if had the tools we have today 1000 years ago, relative to a 13 billion years back in time, a thousand years amounts to little.

          Consider what happens to light when it travels extremely long distances through space. Do we really know? No.

          What about our calculations about how long stars last based upon their estimated mass? Well, using that calculation assumes our theories about how the nuclear reactions within a star are correct. It also assume that our mass calculations are correct. They could be correct, but it would not take much of an error to throw off our calculations.

          Basically, we are coming up with lots of theories that are very difficult to verify. Therefore, scientists come up with theories that are at least consistent with each other. Occasionally, they make predictions that something or some effect exists, and they go looking for it and find “it”, but such “proof” is a bit sketchy, particularly since we rarely hear about the predictions that don’t pan out.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          CTom

          The so called scientists who delete God from their minds have by default, pre-programmed their conclusions- and in the end have put forth ‘theories’ which are only that- meant to endow their causes.

          In this sense neither Nye, Degrasse, or Hawkins are scientists- they are poor excuses for the essence of science- things testable/observable/ repeatable.

          To date something in the ‘billions or trillions’ is laughable to any serious man of learning.

          (Btw/ I again posted on your cite and am sent to basement hell/ seems WP does not approve at times of confirming words of goodness)

          Liked by 1 person

        • Citizen Tom says:

          @ColorStorm

          I set up the comment filter to send your comments to moderation. If that works I can approve your comment. May if I approve a few the problem will go away. Otherwise, I will have to contact WordPress support.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. The Night Wind says:

    The Big Bang Theory was more or less disproven by experts on Plasma Physics and Electromagnetism decades ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology. Of course, Academia, Inc. has shut down most discussion of these ‘heresies.’

    Liked by 1 person

    • ColorStorm says:

      @nightwind
      As far as what’s observable, I simply point to a straw in a glass of water a foot from my eyes. The distortion is telling.

      With an atmosphere that is loaded with vapor, you can be sure any calculations that do not admit ‘distortion,’ is suspect. And the higher one goes, the greater the distortion, so if so called scientists cannot be certain of what lies a mile under the oceans, (the straw) rest assured, they are equally clueless as to what is above.

      So sure, go ahead and date a gallon of water in the Atlantic. I have little tolerance for these pompous mouths of science. Tkx.

      Like

      • The Night Wind says:

        I don’t think it’s a matter so much of Science not knowing as much as it is scientists not wanting to know. It’s not like it was a few years ago when guys worked in their labs on a problem and came up with a theory that got tested and tried out. Now, science is rooted in politics and scientists are paid to get the results that Special Interests want. It’s been that way here since about the mid-70’s and why every other country is kicking our asses in hard science. About the only things America’s made any progress on are things like surveillance, genetic engineering, and drugs—things that have potential weaponizing applications.

        It also used to be that theories were taught as theories—widely believed but open to question. Today they’re taught as dogmas. It’s not only Faith, but competing scientific theory is not allowed.

        Liked by 2 people

        • ColorStorm says:

          Good point re Not wanting to know. True.

          While God may not be in the Petri dish- or in the microscope- His hand can surely be seen. At least my PhD friend who specializes in microbiology says as much.

          He states that the evidence silences every atheist/ IF they are honest.

          Like

        • sklyjd says:

          Science has never taught theories in the sense you are using it as theories.

          A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not “guesses” but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than “just a theory”. It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory#:~:text=A%20scientific%20theory%20is%20a,accounts%20of%20the%20real%20world.

          There are many scientists who take their work seriously and would not compromise themselves, the peer reviewed publications are the best regulator of this so far, but as in everything the dirty water will come to the surface.

          Like

        • The Night Wind says:

          Sklyjd: Regarding what you say of theories: Postmodern Science teaches that there’s no biological basis in gender and that homosexual relationships are equal to (if not better than) so-called ‘traditional binary’ relationships. This is taught as scientific dogma and any opposing view is silenced. The Evolutionists, on the other hand, teach that life evolved as dominant species through sexual selection of the fittest. This is also taught as dogma and any opposing view is silenced. (In the interests of full disclosure here, I believe there’s an element of truth, though incomplete, in the latter theory; I reject the former theory because it’s utterly absurd from any standpoint). There is no way that either theory can be objectively tested because political interests drive both even though two minutes of serious thought show that they can’t be simultaneously true.
          As far as gravity goes: it’s a theory, but experiments show that it has basis in fact. The Plasma Cosmologists actually argue that the Laws of Gravity can’t explain the uneven distribution of cosmic bodies in the universe as the Big Bang Theorists state.

          Liked by 1 person

        • sklyjd says:

          “Postmodern Science teaches that there’s no biological basis in gender and that homosexual relationships are equal to (if not better than) so-called ‘traditional binary’ relationships.”

          Absolutely wrong TNW. Science does not teach such things; any relationship is a normal relationship for humans because it simply happens regardless of half-baked non-scientific ideas from religions. We follow the same behaviours as the rest of the animal kingdom.

          “The Evolutionists, on the other hand, teach that life evolved as dominant species through sexual selection of the fittest.”

          Yes if this were true so what? Whatever you can dream up to support your religious dogma is total desperation. This you know very well; all religions are hanging onto their doctrines by their fingertips with the knowledge God will not provide the funds as more people leave the churches every day. You are on a losing battle against science.

          Like

    • sklyjd says:

      I think that Wikipedia says it all. It says nothing about disproving the big bang theory but does say:

      Cosmologists and astrophysicists who have evaluated plasma cosmology reject it because it does not match the observations of astrophysical phenomena as well as current cosmological theory. Very few papers supporting plasma cosmology have appeared in the literature since the mid-1990s.

      I believe if it had weight that would be the prominent theory, however you automatically take on a conspiracy that some dark forces are at work. Science does not quite work like your politics has done recently.

      Like

      • The Night Wind says:

        No…Science works today like your side’s politics work; mostly because both sides are funded by the same interest groups. What gets published goes through layers of censors before it gets approved as consistent with the Neo-Marxist positions of Academia, Incorporated. Anything else simply gets dismissed. Even worse, professionals lose their positions or licenses if they dare question the Established Narrative.

        Like

        • sklyjd says:

          Absolute rubbish, “neo-marxist positions of Academia,” you claim. You are obviously a Trump supporter, a political expert and a conspiracist merchant. Pray to your God and ask for the truth because I am so dammed sure you are paranoid about everything that the Russians or the Chinese communists may do to you not allowing your thoughts to be logical.

          Try as you will to shut down science you will never win because people want to know the truth.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Steve/ how many times have I told u ‘science’ can’t get right TODAYS weather forecast/ using ALL the modern tech drummed up by science.

          Your science is guesswork/ and it is embarrassing. And you are concerned with billions of years? Wake up to the truth of your little God’s failures.

          True science is never embarrassed, and nature agrees with truth and arithmetic. Observable. Testable. Repeatable.

          This leaves out your sunken failure s.

          Like

        • sklyjd says:

          Not a good try CS. Using the weather forecast to rubbish science is truly not any sort of example.
          Consider the facts, Changes in weather are primarily the result of a change in temperature, air pressure, and humidity in the atmosphere. When any of these three variables experience a substantial change, it can lead to a complete change in weather conditions.

          Three factors have been identified that always contribute to erratic atmospheric conditions: Temperate Climate Zone, Coastal Region and Flat Topography.

          In summary, weather services are accurate and do compensate for weather changes. Unforeseen circumstances can still interfere, though, as well as your own location that may always experience different weather than anyone ten minutes’ drive away. (ownyourweather.com)

          Whatever you say to degrade science, do not forget man can land on the moon and of course your computer, the World Wide Web and internet connection are scientific discoveries as is your fridge, microwave, washing machine and automobile from scientific knowhow.

          Please CS you can go to some remote towns and deserts in Africa or the Middle East to live life like Jesus with donkeys and camels without having to worship scientific advantages.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Sorry Steve but my simple point destroys your narrative and worship of ‘science’ so- called.

          This is 2021, not the Stone Age that you like to try to dismantle. A forecast of 0% chance of rain- that is met with a blistering rainstorm- using ALL the tools of your science- it is embarrassing when you speak of billions of years to support your junk science- when ONE day cannot even be met with success- sorry u can’t see it- thus meaning the CERTAINTY of ZERO PERCENT- is wrought with 100% FAILURE.

          But I actually relish true science- whereas u do not. PONTIFICATE says it all- as are the carnival acts of Nye, Degrasse, etc.

          Like

        • sklyjd says:

          Ahh, so you are off to the desert then CS?

          Liked by 1 person

        • ColorStorm says:

          Just because God made sand and camels, does not mean I have to spend a life in drama dairy activity.

          Like

  3. SLIMJIM says:

    Thank you for this post

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s