I’m not impressed

So the latest brick to fall in the self-made building of pride is apparently making headlines. ‘Scientists’ are publicly professing skepticism as to Charles Darwin’s ‘theories.’ Well now, what kind of ‘scientists’ must these be, to ‘now’ conclude that fraud is not a new thing?

And He made them after their kind.

What light bulb in their mind was suddenly turned on for them to see in the dark the error of their once alleged enlightened minds?

https://www.wnd.com/2019/02/1000-scientists-go-public-with-doubts-on-evolution/

Newsflash: Darwin’s theories were always dark counsel, appealing only to the deviant of thought, they who only see themselves as the vaults of knowledge, they who cannot conceive of any One greater than themselves, ‘they’ who have bought and sold the useless idea of Darwin’s ‘species,’ not happy in knowing that old Chuck merely stole the copyrights for the ‘kinds’ as clearly demonstrated in the book of Genesis, compliments of the Creator who made them.

Hey Chuck and friends: The bee is still the bee, while you may have hives as you complain, the tiger is still the tiger, the lion the lion, and yep, the great whales are still the greatest guests of the oceans. It’s a btich seeing the ‘kinds’ faithfully proving every word of God is good.

So no surprise here with this article in WND, and I’m not impressed at people’s public statements that Darwin may have been out to lunch, for truth be told, there are far more people than you can imagine who know his theories are lies, but they are afraid to admit, lest they be thought idiots. Guess what? What kind of idiot would think that a whale once walked the earth………………………………………?

 

Advertisements

About ColorStorm

Blending the colorful issues of life with the unapologetic truth of scripture, while adding some gracious ferocity.
This entry was posted in God and science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

67 Responses to I’m not impressed

  1. tildeb says:

    You’re using WND as source? There’s your problem; it’s for nutcases, idiots,and chronic droolers unable to think their way past a premise.

    Evolution is the fundamental pillar of modern biology. There is no other scientific position; there is only scientific denialism in contrast. (And – granted – there’s lots of that. Scientific denialism is already a money making multi-billion dollar industry.) To believe otherwise is equivalent to believing gravity is an ideology and pretending there is some divided camp in physics between gravitationalists and those who deny its scientific validity and usefulness. It’s a delusion. And WND makes money selling the delusion. What does that make of those who buy into this denialism?

    Like

    • ColorStorm says:

      Hi tildeb-
      Who cares what the source is? The FACT remains. For God’s sake even I can find morality in atheism, because God has hardwired right from wrong.

      But you must have missed the point where I proved the theft by Darwin as he used the ‘species’ to circumvent the ‘kinds’ of Genesis.

      Look real hard at the tiger above and my little notation. 😉

      As you allege Darwin as a god, I prove God is God. Herein is the difference. Let God be true, and every man a liar. Old Chuck was a liar IF He denied the Creator His engineering feats of creation. It’s rather simple.

      Like

      • Not that it is needed, but the foundations of modern biology are actually, “cell theory, evolution, genetics, homeostasis, and energy.” Evolution in this context has dozen of complex and varied definitions, none of them actually related to Darwin’s theories. In fact, Darwin himself never actually used the term “evolution” until it was pressed upon him much later.

        Liked by 2 people

        • sklyjd says:

          All you mentioned do have relations to Darwin’s theories, in fact evolutionary biology is so firmly integrated with the rest of biology that it is not possible to mark a boundary between them. The relationship between all life and evolutionary principles can not be separated as you have tried to do.

          Like

        • tildeb says:

          No, IB22, those are the founding principles. Modern biology is considered the modern synthesis, namely the seamless meshing of evolutionary theory with genetics. These are the pillars upon which the principles derive.

          Of course, creationists have no answer to why this synthesis is seamless with genetics on the one hand and an indisputable scientific theory they must consider wrong on the other. The hypocrisy and blatant denialism needed for such creationists to accept genetics while pretending its handmaiden evolutionary theory is factually wrong is one of the seven modern wonders of the world and a source of deep amusement to those of us who actually respect the scientific method and the knowledge it regularly and consistently produces for everyone everywhere all the time. Creationism? A dead end for knowledge, derived as it from a superstitious belief in magical POOF!ism. Who could have predicted no knowledge would ever be produced from creationism… other than anyone who can think?

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Vintage tildeb-

          the pillars…..

          Where is my laugh button, when you deny the greatest fact of all that the building called earth, has FOUNDATIONS, the true pillars that embarrass godless evolution, engineered by God Himself, needing no help from your accidental and therefore purposeless existence.

          Would to God you had the decency to be so embarrassed at such blatant disrespect for life, especially humanity.

          I will pause and defer any further mental punishment headed your way by the illustrious ib22.

          Like

        • tildeb says:

          Ah yes, the earth’s pillars. Where are they exactly, CS? What are they made of and how do they hold ‘up’ the earth you say is flat?

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Maybe you can collect all your ‘life is an accident’ friends, go on a quest, and find them yourself.

          Then again, if the ark of the covenant stared you in the face,
          or Joshua’s trumpet, or even the ark of Noah, it would not be enough, so here’s a hint: they exist.

          You just don’t get it-truth does not need your approval. As to an alleged 67,000 mph orbit- prove it.

          I’ve never seen it- what great faith you must have because you have not seen it either.

          Oh the dilemma of godlessness.

          Like

      • John, obviously Sources for information matter as to their reliability to be believed. You should agree to this. It’s not rocket science, you know. (Unless you distrust NASA)

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Sources? You neglect the only source that matters. God’s word embarrasses every mouth against it.

          Plain and simple, scripture is excellent in every way, including more true science than all libraries combined.

          Like

        • So… you DO believe the source of an information matters… good on you. There may yet be hope after all. Progress of a kind.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Your reading and interpretive skills need work. The SOURCE, as in SOURCE of all things, belongs to God and He proves it in His word.

          Don’t pretend to be both deaf and blind.

          Like

  2. limey says:

    Lol. The discovery institute. That place that promotes religion over science. Those aren’t scientists. Oh boy.

    Like

  3. grabaspine says:

    Cs, you are not impressed by anything that counters or debunks what you believe. I’m neither surprised or impressed by your lack of ‘impression’. Keep those blinders tight.

    Like

    • ColorStorm says:

      Hey mike-

      Where in your mind can you possibly conceive a tiger or lion, reproducing itself, as opposed to birthing a possum……and where pray tell did these animals devise a scheme apart From Intelligence?

      Yet it is I who is delusional? Oh please; leaving Christianity should not mean giving up your brain to stupidity.

      Like

      • grabaspine says:

        Arguments from personal Incredulity and scientific ignorance is all you have.

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          All I have? Yeah mike, fortunately the ALL has the approval of heaven, nature, scripture, the conscience, and of course true science, which is observable, testable, and repeatable, things obviously foreign to the likes of your godless hero Chuck Darwin.

          So by your own words, you agree with lying science which is not testable, never repeatable, and of course your guesswork of accidental evolution is never observable.

          Sorry mike, but it is clock cleaning time for you and every visitor who refuses to engage the brain, let alone common sense.

          Like

      • grabaspine says:

        …except for the continual insulting those who disagree that is.

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Insulting? It is insulting to deny the Creator mike. Deal with it.

          But your own track record of guile trying to trap believers, while you refuse yo see the error of your ways……..per the discussion on the table,

          That God created the tiger to reproduce itself and not a monkey; that God created humans to create children and not a rhino.

          If you can’t see this………….then you deserve all the contempt you earn, and we are not even talking about the terms of redemption.

          Like

        • grabaspine says:

          John, I’m insulting No One. Literally… No One that you can demonstrate to actually exist in reality. And all the rabbit trails and misdirections about evolution, morality and Flat (stationary) Earth are just non sequiturs so you can assert what you cannot demonstrate. Your responsibility is to Demonstrate the truth of what you believe to be true. Not just that a God exists, but that the God declared and promoted in the bible exists. No ‘general’ amorphous ‘god’ will suffice.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          You have left mud trails 3 ft deep. Your new allies are enough proof.

          Atheism is the religion of fools. Congrats.

          Like

        • grabaspine says:

          Still not an atheist. Just not a Christian anymore

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          You may want to pick up a copy of the splendid book ‘the Buddha of Christendom’ by the incomparable Sir Robert Anderson, once a detective for Scotland Yard, who wrote with such clarity and without apology- just what I do! Ha!

          Maybe a person of his spiritual mettle may interest you.

          My fav of his is ‘the silence of God.’

          Like

        • grabaspine says:

          I’ve read a couple of Anderson’s books back in the 90s. Not my cup of tea currently though. I do agree that the God of the Bible is very silent outside of the bible.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          And therein lies the utmost credibility of God’s word.

          The silence of God in the midst of universal depravity should actually get your attention.

          No doubt as it was in the days of Noah. Too bad you refuse to see it mike.

          Like

  4. sklyjd says:

    You poor old lion CS. 1000 or even 10,000 scientists is only a mere drop in the ocean, and it does not matter how many letters you have behind your name you can still be deluded, after all most of them will also believe the dead can rise from the grave.

    Like

    • ColorStorm says:

      Perhaps Steve you should study the life and times of a simple flower bulb- how it appears ‘dead’ but arises a year later to the most wondrous of flowers.

      So what’s a few years in the grave as man but resembles the useless and lifeless bulb.

      Btw, I don’t care how many people believe something- what makes it right is whether it is true.

      In this Chuck Darwin is the greatest of failures. Go ahead and follow him while a simple flower laughs at your ignorance.

      Like

  5. I appreciated this post, Colorstorm.

    Poor Darwin. Seriously, the man set out to study orchids…. and love. He never even used the word “evolution” nor did he speak of monkeys until much later. It wasn’t until political pressure began to bear down on him and some of his ideas were taken over by philosophy, theology, politics, that things got all convoluted.

    I cringe every time I see his name offered up as a “evidence” of atheism or “science,” since he was a Christian, an Anglican, actually went to Cambridge to become a clergyman,and did not doubt the literalism of the bible. His faith may have waffled around a bit at the end, but he never claimed to be an atheist and you can sometimes hear his roots in his very words, “life having been breathed into them” or “most beautiful, most wonderful, most fearfully made.”

    Truthfully, I think Darwin himself would be most pleased by this WND link and by your post. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • sklyjd says:

      He was pressured by political, religious and even family pressures to drop his theories. Thankfully he did not, and millions of people have benefited health wise, lived longer and mankind will continue to benefit for ever. Humans who take any sort of medication should never forget this.

      Nov. 24 1880
      Dear Sir, I am sorry to have to inform you that I do not believe in the Bible as a divine revelation & therefore not in Jesus Christ as the son of God.
      Yours faithfully
      Ch. Darwin
      (Read more: (smithsonian mag)

      Liked by 1 person

    • ColorStorm says:

      It takes a fairer-minded person to see beyond the fog- to find the silver lining in the obscure.

      While I am not sure as to the attributes men have heaped upon him, (and much is hearsay) I am sure that God is responsible for the ‘kinds,’ and any subsequent species that recognizes the Creator is fine by me- no doubt like all the quotes attributed to Einstein were inaccurate, probably men got Darwin all twisted up too.

      I always thought he was the hero of the atheist. Lol

      Like

      • Ha! He is often the hero of the atheist, but that didn’t really happen until long after the poor man died and couldn’t even defend himself.

        As to your pseudo scientists or atheist fundamentalists above, still trying to proclaim evolution is the foundation of biology, they fail to understand that “evolution” in a scientific context and definition, does not mean the theories of Charles Darwin.

        Kind of an interesting factoid, but “evolutionary biology” didn’t even come into existence until the 1940’s and it wasn’t even in our universities until the 1980’s.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Arkenaten says:

          And when did Young Earth Creationism raise it’s rather silly head, IB? Do you know?
          Certainly a very, very long time after your own Church Fathers left this earth.
          They might not have been as scientifically aware as those in this day and age but they weren’t as dumb as soup as YEC proponents either.

          Like

  6. Citizen Tom says:

    @ColorStorm

    Whenever an Atheist tells me Atheism is not a religion, all I have to is mention the “Theory” of Evolution and watch the fervor with which they defend this theory as a proven fact.

    Atheists need to think about the meaning of the word “heuristic”. The Theory of Evolution is not testable. If we cannot test the theory, we cannot prove it.

    What have Atheists done instead? They have assumed, based upon the preponderance of the evidence that the Theory of Evolution is true. That’s an awful big assumption. It is really far easier to believe in God and that Jesus rose from the dead. God is here now. We have historical evidence that Jesus rose from the dead. All we have for the Theory of Evolution are fossil records that are millions of years old and some speculation based upon gene “theories”.

    Liked by 2 people

    • ColorStorm says:

      Tkx tom- I too have been saying that for ages. There is zero proof of those theories being based in reality because they are NOT observable, testable, and certainly not repeatable.

      And yes, the big ‘A’ is a religion much to the chagrin of its devotees.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tildeb says:

        From National Center for Science Education: “The scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence.”

        Your contrary assertion about created ‘kinds’ possesses zero scientific merit. But it is full to the brim with religiously inspired incompatible belief with reality. Sorry, CS: that’s just the way it is.

        Although you can sometimes find religion without creationism, you will never find creationism without religion. That is its sole promulgator. Not reality; contrary religious belief. And this anti-scientific creationist belief you and many others hold does not align with what reality shows us is the case. Of course, reality could have aligned with independent ‘kinds’ as you believe and genetics could have demonstrated this to be the case, but alas it seamlessly supports evolutionary theory of common decent as Darwin proposed. That’s the brute fact reality reveals. Not creationism. Not intelligent design. Not ‘kinds’. Common decent. That fits all the evidence. From reality. Everywhere we look. Consistently. Reliably. All the rest of the creationist hand waving about atheists and non belief in anti-scientific religious ideas as another kind of religious belief and Darwin was a religious believer and so on does not address the brute fact that reality does not support the creationist belief in kinds but does align with the evolutionary model. And reality demonstrates the evolutionary model’s usefulness by producing what belief in creationism does not, namely, new knowledge and insight into how life changes over time and by what mechanisms as a well as all kinds of applications, therapies, and technologies based on the evolutionary explanation that just so happen to work for everyone everywhere all the time. Reality demonstrates your religiously inspired belief in creationism to be factually wrong.

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Of course there is no merit in anything I say tildeb- I answer to God whereas you answer to alleged popularity.

          You just don’t get it. I don’t care how many men put forth their theories and assumptions; without recognizing the ‘kinds’ of Genesis, all science is but agreed guesswork with ZERO evidence. Zero.

          Must be a bitch for you to ignore and pretend to be blind to the FACT that monkeys birth monkeys and not weasels; that lions birth lions and not hyenas.

          The ‘kinds’ of Genesis lay to waste ALL godless so called science, the little god which you in fact have erected in your own image.

          And this is the killer. Not that you think scripture does not present correct science, but that the science of scripture is true, therefore meaning ALL of God’s word is true.

          Of course it’s all true, but your greater concern should be the perfections of the sun, moon, and stars, those orbs of perfection which further embarrass lying evolution.

          Like

        • tildeb says:

          Jonathan Swift said, “Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired.” Belief in creationism is exactly this, an ill Opinion which by reasoning was never acquired. What you are using, CS, is opinion by authority that has no merit adduced from reality.

          And you put your utter lack of knowledge on display by saying, “Must be a bitch for you to ignore and pretend to be blind to the FACT that monkeys birth monkeys and not weasels.” This not only indicates no understanding of what common decent means but fails to account for the shared genetic damage you and I and every other simian inherits from our common ancestry. Yes, CS, your genetic code demonstrates the validity of common descent as a scientific explanation between you and the monkeys you say are a different ‘kind’ created by a magical POOF! Master. That’s why your belief in creationism is anti-scientific; you not only deny fundamental science but your substitute explanation explains nothing.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          And the great poet Gibran said: ‘I know his father, how can I not know him.’ So what tildeb, we can quote mine all day long, but at the end of the day, you simply rely on the guesswork of they with the cleverest imagination.

          I rely on He who created the brain that allows us such imagination. You mistakenly ASSUME I do not understand your ‘species’ argument, when I reference the ‘kinds,’ and the fact that a tiger births a tiger no doubt escapes you for it is the SEED which I address, and the SEED plot that you conveniently ignore. But don’t mistake my lack of interest in your dialog with ignorance, maybe I am just too bored to continue an argument that has long been adjudicated.

          Apart from God tilteb, you have NOTHING. NO THING, at all, ever. Instead of fighting Him, why don’t you get to know the one who created you, and knows your doubts, fears, desires, and is well aware of your smokescreen sideshows pretending to be ‘science.’

          Let me repeat: there is more true science in Genesis…………………….aw nevermind, I cant talk to you while your fingers are in your ears.

          Like

        • tildeb says:

          So does this mean you will not be celebrating Darwin’s birthday today?

          Liked by 2 people

        • ColorStorm says:

          As obviously accomplished as he was, I can assure you that if alive today, and after another go round, he would tell the ‘scientific community’ that his small mistakes of calculations regarding finches were responsible for conclusions that he could not possibly endorse.

          And that the cult of Darwinism is something he could not approve of, since he really is no more wiser than a single finch, UNLESS, he gave courtesy to the Creator.

          But what about you? Are you of more value than a single finch? Why? Why not? Careful how you answer.

          Like

    • Arkenaten says:

      If evolution is not true how do you explain something such as bugs which ”change” over time and become resistant to antibiotics?

      Like

      • ColorStorm says:

        Sorry- didn’t see it-

        Like

      • Citizen Tom says:

        Why do I have to explain that? I don’t claim to know the answer?

        How can you prove that the Theory of Evolution explains it?

        If some lunatic government killed all the five year olds that lacked blue eyes, after a couple centuries, everyone almost all the babies would have blue eyes, and that would prove what?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Arkenaten says:

          I didn’t say you had to explains it I asked what explanation you had for it.

          How can you prove that the Theory of Evolution explains it?

          I would say the simplest most obvious answer is because the bugs evolve.
          Thus, we have evolution.
          Why is this so scary for you to consider?

          Like

        • Citizen Tom says:

          The fact that people make assertions without proof isn’t scary. It is pitiful.

          Like

        • Arkenaten says:

          Do you consider there is no evidence that bugs have not evolved to become resistant to certain antibiotics?

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          I’m not surprised Doug that Tom finds it pretty much pointless to engage a topic that has long been settled.

          Your greater concern should be why there are still bats, bees, frogs, and rats.

          Sin and death kinda changes things- but don’t be fooled thinking cell phones are indicative of evo-

          And, while a blue jay may adapt to your feeder, he will never be an eagle, a turkey, or a heron.

          Like

        • Arkenaten says:

          Settled? By whom?
          This is the delusional perspective of Creationists as science is unraveling that silly ball of thread ever moment of every day.
          Stay tuned , and maybe it’s best if you donpt blink much either

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Settled by the most careful sleuth as in Sir Robert Anderson of Scotland Yard, whose scriptural investigative skills have no equal, to the simple schoolboy who use the God given brain.

          And oh there is this. ‘ settled in heaven,’ regardless what fools on earth think.

          Don’t be a fool.

          Like

        • Citizen Tom says:

          Think! Think blue eyes.

          Do the bugs that already have the trait required to survive survive? Then what evolution are we talking about? Do the survivors have multiple characteristics which promoted survival and share those those characteristics? That would tend to increase survivability, but it still would not involve evolution.

          I don’t know the answer. We don’t have the capacity to either prove or disprove whether life evolved. Since Jesus affirmed the Old Testament, I go with Genesis. It lacks a lot details, but it has the important one.

          Genesis 1:1 English Standard Version Anglicised (ESVUK)

          1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

          You don’t want to believe that? Well, the Bible records eyewitness testimony. The New Testament was written by Jesus’ contemporaries.

          Starting shortly after Jesus rose from the dead, the authorities tried to suppress Christianity. They killed people, and still the apostles spread Gospel. Then those the apostles had taught did the same.

          There is nothing else like the Gospel. Every other religion requires us to do something to be saved. Jesus just requires us to repent of our slavery to sin and believe in Him.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Arkenaten says:

          So, basically what you are saying is: Yes I acknowledge that bugs change to resist antibiotics but I will not accept evolution.

          The New Testament was written by Jesus’ contemporaries.

          No it wasn’t and you have no evidence to show otherwise. And this is not the consensus view of scholars, biblical or otherwise.,

          Starting shortly after Jesus rose from the dead,

          Faith statement. You have no evidence to demonstrate the veracity of this assertion.

          BONUS FOOTAGE BY HOST: Evidence? If God’s word is not enough, surely the dry and crusty attempts by fools will not suffice.

          The Bible is the only evidence needed, and this is exactly WHY ignorant people spend a lifetime trying to discredit it.

          The Bible alone defines what love us.
          The Bible alone presents the context for knowledge and wisdom.

          The Bible alone tells of the grace of God.

          And the Bible alone tells of scoffers and mockers of all ages. No wonder this commenter cries for evidence, as the evidence itself incriminates.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Citizen Tom says:

          Well, at least our host’s bonus footage makes sense.

          It is a strange thing. With our words we actually do have considerable power. The Bible says that we do. Still, there are limits, and those limits are difficult to accept.

          I know I cannot lift a car. So I don’t waste time trying. Yet from time to time I still try — still spend words — on someone who refuses to be persuaded. I wonder why that is. Even when I know it is God who saves, I wonder why that is.

          Think! I did not use the word mutate. I just pointed out how environmental factors can encourage the manifestation of preexisting genetic characteristics. How stubborn do you have to be not to see that? God only knows.😞

          Liked by 1 person

        • Arkenaten says:

          Like I said. You will accept change but not evolution.
          Indoctrination and willful ignorance on full display.
          What next? Are you going to say that the global flood and Noah’s ark were historical events?
          I suppose CS’s blog needs some humour from time to time, so go for it.

          MORE BONUS THOUGHTS FROM OUR QUIET HOST, AND MORE LAUGHTER FROM ALL SIDES:
          First a man would have to prove, (there exists no such man) either by first hand knowledge, no hearsay, and by direct visual proof, (silly CGI does not count) that there exists such a thing as the globe. (there goes global warming down the drain. lol

          But rest assured, regardless of a mans opinions, the FACT remains: there was a world wide flood, just as the good book asserts. Whether one believes it or not is irrelevant to the history; prove to me it snowed 3 thousand years ago………………. HA! The melted flakes cry in hilarity at the ignorance of the proud.

          God’s word is GOOD. Our words? Eh, not so much. Thank God for the foundation of intelligence, something apparently lacking in the disconnected wires of godless evo.

          Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          Sweet answer Tom

          Liked by 1 person

  7. Arkenaten says:

    We have historical evidence that Jesus rose from the dead

    That is a patently false statement. There is no such evidence at all.

    Like

    • ColorStorm says:

      David. Solomon. Esther. Mordecai. Daniel. Ezra. Nehemiah. Joshua. Agag. Abraham. Moses. Cain. Adam. Methuselah. Noah. Seth. Paul. Timothy. Herod. Pilate. The Lord Jesus Christ.

      All verifiable. All provable. All historical certainties. You have our deepest sympathies if you have erased truth from your mind.

      Let God be true, and every man a liar. Congratulations for joining the ranks of the mentally challenged.

      Like

      • Arkenaten says:

        And where in that rather odd reply is the historical evidence for the supposed resurrection of the character Jesus of Nazareth?

        Like

        • ColorStorm says:

          This is not an invitation to extend your stubbornness.

          You just refuse to see. The reliability of scripture proves the current existence of Christ.

          Every word of God is good and true. Were you not supposed to waste your time at Waters?

          Like

  8. Arkenaten says:

    MORE BONUS THOUGHTS FROM OUR QUIET HOST, AND MORE LAUGHTER FROM ALL SIDES:
    First a man would have to prove, (there exists no such man) either by first hand knowledge, no hearsay, and by direct visual proof, (silly CGI does not count) that there exists such a thing as the globe. (there goes global warming down the drain. lol

    You are, quite simply a complete and utter******* (EDIT REMOVAL- unnecessary and inappropriate, lacking decency, and a slur not appreciated on this blog)

    Like

  9. LOL, just read Tom’s words, “I know I cannot lift a car. So I don’t waste time trying.”

    Right?? And yet we’ve all heard the tales of superhero feats of strength, of people who actually did lift cars to save others. Truth really can be stranger than fiction. Cultivating a bit of intellectual curiousity and having an open mind about our world, is kind of what Colorstorm offers.

    And of course, the Little Stone Head is always at the ready to show us why those things are so important and will help to add to the richness of our lives and our understanding. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • ColorStorm says:

      Yeah msb, the adrenaline rush of Superman every so often, good reminder there.

      I’m thinking of that appropriate truth: ‘there is a friend who sticketh closer than a brother.’ Of course the Lord first and always, but we too are beneficiaries of His emolument too, and it’s wonderful to know there are some who always seem to have your back. As it should be that all men might know the depths and range of fellowship. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s